So I’ve just finished Demonology,
a text published in the late 1500’s and written by King James VI of Scottland/I
of England. This dude obviously had a huge influence over not one, but two
enormous groups of people. It seems that although he could have made great
strides towards harmony between the two cultures he ruled over, he was
unfortunately, bat freaking crazy. While I’m not saying he was a bad king, I am
saying that he was a little weirdo and should probably not have been in charge.
Examples of the weirdness of King James I/VI according to
the forward of this text: First of all, the poor nutter butter is the son of
Bloody Mary of Scotland (who made it a point to kill her husband, decided she
liked the rush and went out on a not so secret killing spree). Little James was
fatherless and likely scarred for life as his mom was basically a terrorist.
Enough about her though. James was very well read- probably because he wanted
everyone to believe that he was divinely appointed to the throne by God and therefore,
knew everything. For the same reason he was also a religious nut. He had a new
translation of the bible printed as soon as he became king (one which carefully
translated certain words to James’ benefit). He was very sexually confused it
seems. He was possibly gay as he preferred
the company of young boys. However, it was also know that while “hunting” James
liked to torture the crap out of animals, have sex with them, and then kill
them and roll around in their blood.
Yes.
Now that I have your attention, I would like to emphasize
that this man is the man responsible for the whole “thou shalt not suffer a
witch to live” thing. I’m talking about Exodus 22:18. In the most popular
edition of the bible ever –the King James Bible- that little quote pops up, and
it was a big reason that many innocent men and women were tortured and killed
in witch hunts. This quote was purposefully mistranslated by James. The Hebrew
word that’s wrong here is kashaph, which James had translated to say witch. What
it more accurately means is poisoner.
For some reason, schizophrenia maybe, James was positive
that witches were out to get him. He encouraged the torture and death of witches,
going so far as to invent new tortures and means of death for them himself. He
also wrote this book, Demonology, on
how to identify and then suitably punish witches and magicians.
I just want there to be an understanding when I talk about
this text, that these conjurers are not based off of anything other than one
influential man’s fears. Let us remember that when we explore this quote.
“What can be the cause that there are twentie women given to
that craft, where ther is one man?/EPI: The reason is easie, for as that sexe is
frailer then man is, so is it easier to be intrapped in these grosse snares of
the Deuill, as was ouer well proued to be true, by the Serpents deceiuing of Eva at the beginning…”
I can understand the whole Adam and Eve reference, but it
feels like an excuse to scapegoat women to me. I think that James is afraid of
women. I mean, he’s probably gay for a reason. His mother was a mass murderer and he was probably witness to at least some of
that. It seems like he targeted women because he is terrified of them to the
point of irrational action. He wants to see them suffer. Now, James does say
that men can be magicians or necromancers or sorcerers, but it seems that only
women can be witches and witches are common whereas the other types of
conjurers he lists are rare.
No comments:
Post a Comment