So if anyone is reading this and hasn’t seen all of “Once
Upon a Time” season one, SPOILER ALERT!
You have been warned.
Moving on. So, in ABC’s “Once Upon a Time,” Rumplestiltskin is
this evil little dude who plays the grand master of bad magic in fairy tale
land. Right now I’m not sure whether or not Rumple is a sorcerer or some odd
magical creature. I tend to think of sorcerers as being human and having
fantastical magic abilities. However, Rumplestiltskin was human before he had magic.
It was only once he killed a man to obtain magical powers that he became this
kind-of half human beast.
Generally what I am pondering is the definition of a
sorcerer or wizard or warlock. Does someone/thing like Rumplestiltskin fall
under the category of warlock if the magic he has is the thing that is altering
his humanity. What does a sorcerer look like? I’ve already touched on this a
bit with witches –who I think of in terms of Halloween. A witch is green
skinned and has warts and is ugly, but is definitely some kind of human
woman. Is a sorcerer always going to be
human in appearance?
I think that a
sorcerer has to be human in the sense that the only thing separating them from
the average Joe is their magic. For Rumplestiltskin though, his magic is the only thing separating him from a
man, but it alters his appearance to the point where he doesn’t really look
human anymore. He actually takes on that Halloween witch green skin and warts. Is
the way a conjurer looks important in terms of separating them from a superhero
or god?
If Rumplestiltskin is a sorcerer, then he also reaffirms
what I believe about sorcerers drawing magic from the realm rather than being a
source of magic for it. So far, in everything that I’ve read the sorcerer gets
his power from the magical beings around him. This is true for Rumple in fairy
tale land. In order to have power, he needs to strike new deals with the beings
of the realm and trick them into giving him things to fuel his magic. One excellent
example of this is when he uses hair from Prince Charming and Snow White to bottle
true love (which is the most powerful…yadda yadda). Something like a fairy –say
the blue fairy from this series- does not need to do this. She gives magic to
the realm.
If I was going to write a book about vampires and say that
they are magical creatures, I wouldn’t need to include any other magical
creature but the vampire in my book. This is not the pattern that I am seeing
with wizards. They come with other magical creatures included. I think it might
be necessary for them to draw power from the greater power of a realm of
magical creatures.
Hmm. Is magic something you are born with, something you learn, or a combination thereof? Different texts have different answers for this, of course, and I think these different answers help to tell us useful things about the authors and audiences of these texts. Do all of us have the potential to be wizards or not? What is appealing about each of these scenarios?
ReplyDeleteIn both HP and Dresden, for example, magic is something the practitioner is born with, but also something that must be cultivated to reach its true potential. The Harrys are different from those around them - they were born with these abilities - but, like us, they also have to work hard to develop their talent and succeed in the world.
Magic can certainly stand in for so many things in the "real" world - like a vampire, it is a very flexible metaphor, indeed. How is that metaphor changed based on where it comes from and how the practitioner relates to it?